{"id":864,"date":"2011-02-07T22:10:50","date_gmt":"2011-02-07T20:10:50","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/old.ip-law.co.il\/blog\/?p=219"},"modified":"2011-02-07T22:10:50","modified_gmt":"2011-02-07T20:10:50","slug":"motion-to-revive-an-abandoned-design-rejected","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/sanlaw.legal\/he\/motion-to-revive-an-abandoned-design-rejected\/","title":{"rendered":"Motion to Revive an Abandoned Design Rejected"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The Israeli Patent Office rejected on 3 February 2011 a motion to revive an\u00a0abandoned\u00a0design. The design serial No. 40394 \u00a0registered to Ran Gorestien was abandoned March 2010\u00a0for failure to pay the renewal fees.<\/p>\n<p>The motion to revive stated that the design owner did not intend to abandon the design and that due to an office error he failed to pay the renewal fees. The motion stated the Patent Office had the authority to amend the register to correct clerical errors.<\/p>\n<p><!--more-->The Intellectual Property Judge, Yaara Shoshani, held that the Israeli Patent, Designs and Trademarks Registrar had the authority to approve extensions of time subject to Rule 25 of the Designs Rules, 1925. Rule 25 specifically limits the Registrar to those dates stated in the Rules. The IP Judge further held that <span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">a motion to correct a clerical error is not the proper avenue when seeking to revive an abandoned design.<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Finally, the IP Judge stated that in accordance with section 44 of the Patents &amp; Designs Ordinance 1926 the amendment of the Register to revive an abandoned design is in the sole jurisdiction of the District Court. The motion was denied.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Israeli Patent Office rejected on 3 February 2011 a motion to revive an\u00a0abandoned\u00a0design. The design serial No. 40394 \u00a0registered to Ran Gorestien was abandoned March 2010\u00a0for failure to pay the renewal fees. The motion to revive stated that the design owner did not intend to abandon the design and that due to an office [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[43,22],"tags":[48,49],"class_list":["post-864","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-designs","category-patent-office","tag-intellectual-property-judge","tag-revive-an-abandoned-design"],"acf":[],"aioseo_notices":[],"aioseo_head":"\n\t\t<!-- All in One SEO 4.9.8 - aioseo.com -->\n\t<meta name=\"description\" content=\"The Israeli Patent Office rejected on 3 February 2011 a motion to revive an abandoned design. The design serial No. 40394 registered to Ran Gorestien was abandoned March 2010 for failure to pay the renewal fees. The motion to revive stated that the design owner did not intend to abandon the design and that due to an office\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"max-image-preview:large\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Jonathan Agmon\"\/>\n\t<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/sanlaw.legal\/he\/motion-to-revive-an-abandoned-design-rejected\/\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"generator\" content=\"All in One SEO (AIOSEO) 4.9.8\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"he_IL\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Soroker Nordman Riba - Advocates &amp; Patent Attorneys\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Motion to Revive an Abandoned Design Rejected - Soroker Nordman Riba\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"The Israeli Patent Office rejected on 3 February 2011 a motion to revive an abandoned design. The design serial No. 40394 registered to Ran Gorestien was abandoned March 2010 for failure to pay the renewal fees. The motion to revive stated that the design owner did not intend to abandon the design and that due to an office\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/sanlaw.legal\/he\/motion-to-revive-an-abandoned-design-rejected\/\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/sanlaw.legal\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/soroker_Israel_final-CMYK_Artboard-47-copy-3.jpg\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:image:secure_url\" content=\"https:\/\/sanlaw.legal\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/soroker_Israel_final-CMYK_Artboard-47-copy-3.jpg\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1176\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"1089\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2011-02-07T20:10:50+00:00\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2011-02-07T20:10:50+00:00\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Soroker-Agmon-Nordman-Advocates-Patent-Attorneys-395592777166122\/?fref=ts\" \/>\n\t\t<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n\t\t<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Motion to Revive an Abandoned Design Rejected - Soroker Nordman Riba\" \/>\n\t\t<meta name=\"twitter:description\" content=\"The Israeli Patent Office rejected on 3 February 2011 a motion to revive an abandoned design. The design serial No. 40394 registered to Ran Gorestien was abandoned March 2010 for failure to pay the renewal fees. The motion to revive stated that the design owner did not intend to abandon the design and that due to an office\" \/>\n\t\t<meta name=\"twitter:image\" content=\"https:\/\/sanlaw.legal\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/soroker_Israel_final-CMYK_Artboard-47-copy-3.jpg\" \/>\n\t\t<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"aioseo-schema\">\n\t\t\t{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"BlogPosting\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/sanlaw.legal\\\/he\\\/motion-to-revive-an-abandoned-design-rejected\\\/#blogposting\",\"name\":\"Motion to Revive an Abandoned Design Rejected - Soroker Nordman Riba\",\"headline\":\"Motion to Revive an Abandoned Design Rejected\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/sanlaw.legal\\\/he\\\/author\\\/san-law\\\/#author\"},\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/sanlaw.legal\\\/he\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/sanlaw.legal\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2023\\\/07\\\/soroker_Israel_final-CMYK_Artboard-47-copy-7.jpg\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/sanlaw.legal\\\/he\\\/#articleImage\",\"width\":1176,\"height\":1089},\"datePublished\":\"2011-02-07T22:10:50+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2011-02-07T22:10:50+00:00\",\"inLanguage\":\"he-IL\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/sanlaw.legal\\\/he\\\/motion-to-revive-an-abandoned-design-rejected\\\/#webpage\"},\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/sanlaw.legal\\\/he\\\/motion-to-revive-an-abandoned-design-rejected\\\/#webpage\"},\"articleSection\":\"Designs, Patent Office, Intellectual Property Judge, revive an abandoned design\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/sanlaw.legal\\\/he\\\/motion-to-revive-an-abandoned-design-rejected\\\/#breadcrumblist\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/sanlaw.legal\\\/he\\\/#listItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/sanlaw.legal\\\/he\\\/\",\"nextItem\":{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/sanlaw.legal\\\/category\\\/designs\\\/#listItem\",\"name\":\"Designs\"}},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/sanlaw.legal\\\/category\\\/designs\\\/#listItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Designs\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/sanlaw.legal\\\/category\\\/designs\\\/\",\"nextItem\":{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/sanlaw.legal\\\/he\\\/motion-to-revive-an-abandoned-design-rejected\\\/#listItem\",\"name\":\"Motion to Revive an Abandoned Design Rejected\"},\"previousItem\":{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/sanlaw.legal\\\/he\\\/#listItem\",\"name\":\"Home\"}},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/sanlaw.legal\\\/he\\\/motion-to-revive-an-abandoned-design-rejected\\\/#listItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Motion to Revive an Abandoned Design Rejected\",\"previousItem\":{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/sanlaw.legal\\\/category\\\/designs\\\/#listItem\",\"name\":\"Designs\"}}]},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/sanlaw.legal\\\/he\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Soroker Agmon Nordman Riba\",\"description\":\"Advocates & Patent Attorneys\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/sanlaw.legal\\\/he\\\/\",\"telephone\":\"+97299507000\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/sanlaw.legal\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2023\\\/07\\\/soroker_Israel_final-CMYK_Artboard-47-copy-7.jpg\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/sanlaw.legal\\\/he\\\/motion-to-revive-an-abandoned-design-rejected\\\/#organizationLogo\",\"width\":1176,\"height\":1089},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/sanlaw.legal\\\/he\\\/motion-to-revive-an-abandoned-design-rejected\\\/#organizationLogo\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/Soroker-Agmon-Nordman-Advocates-Patent-Attorneys-395592777166122\\\/?fref=ts\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.linkedin.com\\\/company\\\/939531\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/sanlaw.legal\\\/he\\\/author\\\/san-law\\\/#author\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/sanlaw.legal\\\/he\\\/author\\\/san-law\\\/\",\"name\":\"Jonathan Agmon\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/sanlaw.legal\\\/he\\\/motion-to-revive-an-abandoned-design-rejected\\\/#authorImage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/7114cb41b90cd4c53a42eab9da7c122f7810aa9a60c7adde97f8073c0832dfdd?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"width\":96,\"height\":96,\"caption\":\"Jonathan Agmon\"}},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/sanlaw.legal\\\/he\\\/motion-to-revive-an-abandoned-design-rejected\\\/#webpage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/sanlaw.legal\\\/he\\\/motion-to-revive-an-abandoned-design-rejected\\\/\",\"name\":\"Motion to Revive an Abandoned Design Rejected - Soroker Nordman Riba\",\"description\":\"The Israeli Patent Office rejected on 3 February 2011 a motion to revive an abandoned design. The design serial No. 40394 registered to Ran Gorestien was abandoned March 2010 for failure to pay the renewal fees. The motion to revive stated that the design owner did not intend to abandon the design and that due to an office\",\"inLanguage\":\"he-IL\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/sanlaw.legal\\\/he\\\/#website\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/sanlaw.legal\\\/he\\\/motion-to-revive-an-abandoned-design-rejected\\\/#breadcrumblist\"},\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/sanlaw.legal\\\/he\\\/author\\\/san-law\\\/#author\"},\"creator\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/sanlaw.legal\\\/he\\\/author\\\/san-law\\\/#author\"},\"datePublished\":\"2011-02-07T22:10:50+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2011-02-07T22:10:50+00:00\"},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/sanlaw.legal\\\/he\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/sanlaw.legal\\\/he\\\/\",\"name\":\"Soroker Agmon Nordman\",\"description\":\"Advocates & Patent Attorneys\",\"inLanguage\":\"he-IL\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/sanlaw.legal\\\/he\\\/#organization\"}}]}\n\t\t<\/script>\n\t\t<!-- All in One SEO -->\n\n","aioseo_head_json":{"title":"Motion to Revive an Abandoned Design Rejected - Soroker Nordman Riba","description":"The Israeli Patent Office rejected on 3 February 2011 a motion to revive an abandoned design. The design serial No. 40394 registered to Ran Gorestien was abandoned March 2010 for failure to pay the renewal fees. The motion to revive stated that the design owner did not intend to abandon the design and that due to an office","canonical_url":"https:\/\/sanlaw.legal\/he\/motion-to-revive-an-abandoned-design-rejected\/","robots":"max-image-preview:large","keywords":"","webmasterTools":{"miscellaneous":""},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"BlogPosting","@id":"https:\/\/sanlaw.legal\/he\/motion-to-revive-an-abandoned-design-rejected\/#blogposting","name":"Motion to Revive an Abandoned Design Rejected - Soroker Nordman Riba","headline":"Motion to Revive an Abandoned Design Rejected","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/sanlaw.legal\/he\/author\/san-law\/#author"},"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/sanlaw.legal\/he\/#organization"},"image":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https:\/\/sanlaw.legal\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/soroker_Israel_final-CMYK_Artboard-47-copy-7.jpg","@id":"https:\/\/sanlaw.legal\/he\/#articleImage","width":1176,"height":1089},"datePublished":"2011-02-07T22:10:50+00:00","dateModified":"2011-02-07T22:10:50+00:00","inLanguage":"he-IL","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/sanlaw.legal\/he\/motion-to-revive-an-abandoned-design-rejected\/#webpage"},"isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/sanlaw.legal\/he\/motion-to-revive-an-abandoned-design-rejected\/#webpage"},"articleSection":"Designs, Patent Office, Intellectual Property Judge, revive an abandoned design"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/sanlaw.legal\/he\/motion-to-revive-an-abandoned-design-rejected\/#breadcrumblist","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","@id":"https:\/\/sanlaw.legal\/he\/#listItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/sanlaw.legal\/he\/","nextItem":{"@type":"ListItem","@id":"https:\/\/sanlaw.legal\/category\/designs\/#listItem","name":"Designs"}},{"@type":"ListItem","@id":"https:\/\/sanlaw.legal\/category\/designs\/#listItem","position":2,"name":"Designs","item":"https:\/\/sanlaw.legal\/category\/designs\/","nextItem":{"@type":"ListItem","@id":"https:\/\/sanlaw.legal\/he\/motion-to-revive-an-abandoned-design-rejected\/#listItem","name":"Motion to Revive an Abandoned Design Rejected"},"previousItem":{"@type":"ListItem","@id":"https:\/\/sanlaw.legal\/he\/#listItem","name":"Home"}},{"@type":"ListItem","@id":"https:\/\/sanlaw.legal\/he\/motion-to-revive-an-abandoned-design-rejected\/#listItem","position":3,"name":"Motion to Revive an Abandoned Design Rejected","previousItem":{"@type":"ListItem","@id":"https:\/\/sanlaw.legal\/category\/designs\/#listItem","name":"Designs"}}]},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/sanlaw.legal\/he\/#organization","name":"Soroker Agmon Nordman Riba","description":"Advocates & Patent Attorneys","url":"https:\/\/sanlaw.legal\/he\/","telephone":"+97299507000","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https:\/\/sanlaw.legal\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/soroker_Israel_final-CMYK_Artboard-47-copy-7.jpg","@id":"https:\/\/sanlaw.legal\/he\/motion-to-revive-an-abandoned-design-rejected\/#organizationLogo","width":1176,"height":1089},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/sanlaw.legal\/he\/motion-to-revive-an-abandoned-design-rejected\/#organizationLogo"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Soroker-Agmon-Nordman-Advocates-Patent-Attorneys-395592777166122\/?fref=ts","https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company\/939531"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/sanlaw.legal\/he\/author\/san-law\/#author","url":"https:\/\/sanlaw.legal\/he\/author\/san-law\/","name":"Jonathan Agmon","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","@id":"https:\/\/sanlaw.legal\/he\/motion-to-revive-an-abandoned-design-rejected\/#authorImage","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/7114cb41b90cd4c53a42eab9da7c122f7810aa9a60c7adde97f8073c0832dfdd?s=96&d=mm&r=g","width":96,"height":96,"caption":"Jonathan Agmon"}},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/sanlaw.legal\/he\/motion-to-revive-an-abandoned-design-rejected\/#webpage","url":"https:\/\/sanlaw.legal\/he\/motion-to-revive-an-abandoned-design-rejected\/","name":"Motion to Revive an Abandoned Design Rejected - Soroker Nordman Riba","description":"The Israeli Patent Office rejected on 3 February 2011 a motion to revive an abandoned design. The design serial No. 40394 registered to Ran Gorestien was abandoned March 2010 for failure to pay the renewal fees. The motion to revive stated that the design owner did not intend to abandon the design and that due to an office","inLanguage":"he-IL","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/sanlaw.legal\/he\/#website"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/sanlaw.legal\/he\/motion-to-revive-an-abandoned-design-rejected\/#breadcrumblist"},"author":{"@id":"https:\/\/sanlaw.legal\/he\/author\/san-law\/#author"},"creator":{"@id":"https:\/\/sanlaw.legal\/he\/author\/san-law\/#author"},"datePublished":"2011-02-07T22:10:50+00:00","dateModified":"2011-02-07T22:10:50+00:00"},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/sanlaw.legal\/he\/#website","url":"https:\/\/sanlaw.legal\/he\/","name":"Soroker Agmon Nordman","description":"Advocates & Patent Attorneys","inLanguage":"he-IL","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/sanlaw.legal\/he\/#organization"}}]},"og:locale":"he_IL","og:site_name":"Soroker Nordman Riba - Advocates &amp; Patent Attorneys","og:type":"article","og:title":"Motion to Revive an Abandoned Design Rejected - Soroker Nordman Riba","og:description":"The Israeli Patent Office rejected on 3 February 2011 a motion to revive an abandoned design. The design serial No. 40394 registered to Ran Gorestien was abandoned March 2010 for failure to pay the renewal fees. The motion to revive stated that the design owner did not intend to abandon the design and that due to an office","og:url":"https:\/\/sanlaw.legal\/he\/motion-to-revive-an-abandoned-design-rejected\/","og:image":"https:\/\/sanlaw.legal\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/soroker_Israel_final-CMYK_Artboard-47-copy-3.jpg","og:image:secure_url":"https:\/\/sanlaw.legal\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/soroker_Israel_final-CMYK_Artboard-47-copy-3.jpg","og:image:width":1176,"og:image:height":1089,"article:published_time":"2011-02-07T20:10:50+00:00","article:modified_time":"2011-02-07T20:10:50+00:00","article:publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Soroker-Agmon-Nordman-Advocates-Patent-Attorneys-395592777166122\/?fref=ts","twitter:card":"summary_large_image","twitter:title":"Motion to Revive an Abandoned Design Rejected - Soroker Nordman Riba","twitter:description":"The Israeli Patent Office rejected on 3 February 2011 a motion to revive an abandoned design. The design serial No. 40394 registered to Ran Gorestien was abandoned March 2010 for failure to pay the renewal fees. The motion to revive stated that the design owner did not intend to abandon the design and that due to an office","twitter:image":"https:\/\/sanlaw.legal\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/soroker_Israel_final-CMYK_Artboard-47-copy-3.jpg"},"aioseo_meta_data":{"post_id":"864","title":null,"description":null,"keywords":null,"keyphrases":null,"primary_term":null,"canonical_url":null,"og_title":null,"og_description":null,"og_object_type":"default","og_image_type":"default","og_image_url":null,"og_image_width":null,"og_image_height":null,"og_image_custom_url":null,"og_image_custom_fields":null,"og_video":null,"og_custom_url":null,"og_article_section":null,"og_article_tags":null,"twitter_use_og":false,"twitter_card":"default","twitter_image_type":"default","twitter_image_url":null,"twitter_image_custom_url":null,"twitter_image_custom_fields":null,"twitter_title":null,"twitter_description":null,"schema":{"blockGraphs":[],"customGraphs":[],"default":{"data":{"Article":[],"Course":[],"Dataset":[],"FAQPage":[],"Movie":[],"Person":[],"Product":[],"ProductReview":[],"Car":[],"Recipe":[],"Service":[],"SoftwareApplication":[],"WebPage":[]},"graphName":"","isEnabled":true},"graphs":[]},"schema_type":"default","schema_type_options":null,"pillar_content":false,"robots_default":true,"robots_noindex":false,"robots_noarchive":false,"robots_nosnippet":false,"robots_nofollow":false,"robots_noimageindex":false,"robots_noodp":false,"robots_notranslate":false,"robots_max_snippet":null,"robots_max_videopreview":null,"robots_max_imagepreview":"large","priority":null,"frequency":null,"local_seo":null,"breadcrumb_settings":null,"limit_modified_date":false,"ai":null,"created":"2023-07-10 13:41:45","updated":"2025-06-04 19:20:53","seo_analyzer_scan_date":null},"aioseo_breadcrumb":"<div class=\"aioseo-breadcrumbs\"><span class=\"aioseo-breadcrumb\">\n\t\t\t<a href=\"https:\/\/sanlaw.legal\/he\/\" title=\"Home\">Home<\/a>\n\t\t<\/span><span class=\"aioseo-breadcrumb-separator\">&raquo;<\/span><span class=\"aioseo-breadcrumb\">\n\t\t\t<a href=\"https:\/\/sanlaw.legal\/category\/designs\/\" title=\"Designs\">Designs<\/a>\n\t\t<\/span><span class=\"aioseo-breadcrumb-separator\">&raquo;<\/span><span class=\"aioseo-breadcrumb\">\n\t\t\tMotion to Revive an Abandoned Design Rejected\n\t\t<\/span><\/div>","aioseo_breadcrumb_json":[{"label":"Home","link":"https:\/\/sanlaw.legal\/he\/"},{"label":"Designs","link":"https:\/\/sanlaw.legal\/category\/designs\/"},{"label":"Motion to Revive an Abandoned Design Rejected","link":"https:\/\/sanlaw.legal\/he\/motion-to-revive-an-abandoned-design-rejected\/"}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/sanlaw.legal\/he\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/864","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/sanlaw.legal\/he\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/sanlaw.legal\/he\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sanlaw.legal\/he\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sanlaw.legal\/he\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=864"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/sanlaw.legal\/he\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/864\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/sanlaw.legal\/he\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=864"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sanlaw.legal\/he\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=864"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sanlaw.legal\/he\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=864"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}